Haggin Museum Docent Council

The mission of The Haggin Museum is to advance the understanding and appreciation of the fine arts and regional history for the education and enjoyment of the widest possible audience. This is accomplished through the expansion, preservation, interpretation, and presentation of its collection.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

A School That Does Not Compute

A Silicon Valley School That Doesn’t Compute


Grading the Digital School

Blackboards, Not Laptops

Articles in this series are looking at the intersection of education, technology and business as schools embrace digital learning.


Jim Wilson/The New York Times

The Waldorf School in Los Altos, Calif., eschews technology. Here, Bryn Perry reads on a desktop.

By MATT RICHTEL

LOS ALTOS, Calif. — The chief technology officer of eBay sends his children to a nine-classroom school here. So do employees of Silicon Valley giants like Google, Apple, Yahoo and Hewlett-Packard.




Cathy Waheed helps Shira Zeev, a fifth grader. Waldorf parents are happy to delay their children's engagement with technology.

But the school’s chief teaching tools are anything but high-tech: pens and paper, knitting needles and, occasionally, mud. Not a computer to be found. No screens at all. They are not allowed in the classroom, and the school even frowns on their use at home.

Schools nationwide have rushed to supply their classrooms with computers, and many policy makers say it is foolish to do otherwise. But the contrarian point of view can be found at the epicenter of the tech economy, where some parents and educators have a message: computers and schools don’t mix.

This is the Waldorf School of the Peninsula, one of around 160 Waldorf schools in the country that subscribe to a teaching philosophy focused on physical activity and learning through creative, hands-on tasks. Those who endorse this approach say computers inhibit creative thinking, movement, human interaction and attention spans.

The Waldorf method is nearly a century old, but its foothold here among the digerati puts into sharp relief an intensifying debate about the role of computers in education.

“I fundamentally reject the notion you need technology aids in grammar school,” said Alan Eagle, 50, whose daughter, Andie, is one of the 196 children at the Waldorf elementary school; his son William, 13, is at the nearby middle school. “The idea that an app on an iPad can better teach my kids to read or do arithmetic, that’s ridiculous.”

Mr. Eagle knows a bit about technology. He holds a computer science degree from Dartmouth and works in executive communications at Google, where he has written speeches for the chairman, Eric E. Schmidt. He uses an iPad and a smartphone. But he says his daughter, a fifth grader, “doesn’t know how to use Google,” and his son is just learning. (Starting in eighth grade, the school endorses the limited use of gadgets.)

Three-quarters of the students here have parents with a strong high-tech connection. Mr. Eagle, like other parents, sees no contradiction. Technology, he says, has its time and place: “If I worked at Miramax and made good, artsy, rated R movies, I wouldn’t want my kids to see them until they were 17.”

While other schools in the region brag about their wired classrooms, the Waldorf school embraces a simple, retro look — blackboards with colorful chalk, bookshelves with encyclopedias, wooden desks filled with workbooks and No. 2 pencils.

On a recent Tuesday, Andie Eagle and her fifth-grade classmates refreshed their knitting skills, crisscrossing wooden needles around balls of yarn, making fabric swatches. It’s an activity the school says helps develop problem-solving, patterning, math skills and coordination. The long-term goal: make socks.

Down the hall, a teacher drilled third-graders on multiplication by asking them to pretend to turn their bodies into lightning bolts. She asked them a math problem — four times five — and, in unison, they shouted “20” and zapped their fingers at the number on the blackboard. A roomful of human calculators.

In second grade, students standing in a circle learned language skills by repeating verses after the teacher, while simultaneously playing catch with bean bags. It’s an exercise aimed at synchronizing body and brain. Here, as in other classes, the day can start with a recitation or verse about God that reflects a nondenominational emphasis on the divine.

Andie’s teacher, Cathy Waheed, who is a former computer engineer, tries to make learning both irresistible and highly tactile. Last year she taught fractions by having the children cut up food — apples, quesadillas, cake — into quarters, halves and sixteenths.

“For three weeks, we ate our way through fractions,” she said. “When I made enough fractional pieces of cake to feed everyone, do you think I had their attention?”

Some education experts say that the push to equip classrooms with computers is unwarranted because studies do not clearly show that this leads to better test scores or other measurable gains.

Is learning through cake fractions and knitting any better? The Waldorf advocates make it tough to compare, partly because as private schools they administer no standardized tests in elementary grades. And they would be the first to admit that their early-grade students may not score well on such tests because, they say, they don’t drill them on a standardized math and reading curriculum.

When asked for evidence of the schools’ effectiveness, the Association of Waldorf Schools of North America points to research by an affiliated group showing that 94 percent of students graduating from Waldorf high schools in the United States between 1994 and 2004 attended college, with many heading to prestigious institutions like Oberlin, Berkeley and Vassar.

Of course, that figure may not be surprising, given that these are students from families that value education highly enough to seek out a selective private school, and usually have the means to pay for it. And it is difficult to separate the effects of the low-tech instructional methods from other factors. For example, parents of students at the Los Altos school say it attracts great teachers who go through extensive training in the Waldorf approach, creating a strong sense of mission that can be lacking in other schools.

Absent clear evidence, the debate comes down to subjectivity, parental choice and a difference of opinion over a single world: engagement. Advocates for equipping schools with technology say computers can hold students’ attention and, in fact, that young people who have been weaned on electronic devices will not tune in without them.

Ann Flynn, director of education technology for the National School Boards Association, which represents school boards nationwide, said computers were essential. “If schools have access to the tools and can afford them, but are not using the tools, they are cheating our children,” Ms. Flynn said.

Paul Thomas, a former teacher and an associate professor of education at Furman University, who has written 12 books about public educational methods, disagreed, saying that “a spare approach to technology in the classroom will always benefit learning.”

“Teaching is a human experience,” he said. “Technology is a distraction when we need literacy, numeracy and critical thinking.”

And Waldorf parents argue that real engagement comes from great teachers with interesting lesson plans.

“Engagement is about human contact, the contact with the teacher, the contact with their peers,” said Pierre Laurent, 50, who works at a high-tech start-up and formerly worked at Intel and Microsoft. He has three children in Waldorf schools, which so impressed the family that his wife, Monica, joined one as a teacher in 2006.

And where advocates for stocking classrooms with technology say children need computer time to compete in the modern world, Waldorf parents counter: what’s the rush, given how easy it is to pick up those skills?

“It’s supereasy. It’s like learning to use toothpaste,” Mr. Eagle said. “At Google and all these places, we make technology as brain-dead easy to use as possible. There’s no reason why kids can’t figure it out when they get older.”

There are also plenty of high-tech parents at a Waldorf school in San Francisco and just north of it at the Greenwood School in Mill Valley, which doesn’t have Waldorf accreditation but is inspired by its principles.

California has some 40 Waldorf schools, giving it a disproportionate share — perhaps because the movement is growing roots here, said Lucy Wurtz, who, along with her husband, Brad, helped found the Waldorf high school in Los Altos in 2007. Mr. Wurtz is chief executive of Power Assure, which helps computer data centers reduce their energy load.

The Waldorf experience does not come cheap: annual tuition at the Silicon Valley schools is $17,750 for kindergarten through eighth grade and $24,400 for high school, though Ms. Wurtz said financial assistance was available. She says the typical Waldorf parent, who has a range of elite private and public schools to choose from, tends to be liberal and highly educated, with strong views about education; they also have a knowledge that when they are ready to teach their children about technology they have ample access and expertise at home.

The students, meanwhile, say they don’t pine for technology, nor have they gone completely cold turkey. Andie Eagle and her fifth-grade classmates say they occasionally watch movies. One girl, whose father works as an Apple engineer, says he sometimes asks her to test games he is debugging. One boy plays with flight-simulator programs on weekends.

The students say they can become frustrated when their parents and relatives get so wrapped up in phones and other devices. Aurad Kamkar, 11, said he recently went to visit cousins and found himself sitting around with five of them playing with their gadgets, not paying attention to him or each other. He started waving his arms at them: “I said: ‘Hello guys, I’m here.’ ”

Finn Heilig, 10, whose father works at Google, says he liked learning with pen and paper — rather than on a computer — because he could monitor his progress over the years.

“You can look back and see how sloppy your handwriting was in first grade. You can’t do that with computers ’cause all the letters are the same,” Finn said. “Besides, if you learn to write on paper, you can still write if water spills on the computer or the power goes out.”

Posted by Haggin Museum Docent Council at 11:28 AM No comments:

Sunday, October 23, 2011

'Masters of Venice' show at De Young Museum


In Titian's sumptuous "Mars, Venus and Cupid" from the 1550s, the bearded war god embraces Venus' fleshy nude body as she reclines on satin cushions in a moody rural landscape. She caresses his head and kisses him as Cupid hovers above.

"There's nothing more sexy in the 16th century than a painting like this. It's amazingly sensuous," says Lynn Federle Orr, curator of European art at San Francisco's Fine Arts Museums.

The photocopy she's looking at doesn't begin to convey the luminous colors and atmospheric effects of this and other spectacular pictures by Titian, Tintoretto, Giorgione and Veronese in "Masters of Venice: Renaissance Painters of Passion and Power From the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna," which opens Saturday at the M.H. de Young Memorial Museum.

The exhibition, which is only being shown in San Francisco, features 50 works by those giants of Venetian painting and lesser-known but important artists such as Palma Vecchio, Jacopo Bassano and the early Renaissance painter Andrea Mantegna. The pictures come from the 19th century Viennese museum that houses the art and other collections assembled over the centuries by emperors and dukes of the Habsburg dynasty. The works of the seminal Venetian oil painter Giovanni Bellini, who taught Titian and Giorgione, were not deemed in a condition to travel.

Living in a spectacle-loving city built on the water, the Venetian painters were acutely attuned to the colors and shifting atmospheres of their environment, the mist and fog, the light shimmering on the water.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/20/PKSF1LH4KE.DTL#ixzz1bdNeAdX5
Posted by Haggin Museum Docent Council at 12:15 PM No comments:

Maharaja at Asian Art Museum in S.F.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/27/LVH01LK0KF.DTL

Try the above link for a short video of the evening at the museum. (Ctrl+C to copy the URL and then Ctrl+V to paste it into your browser line. Then enter and find the video near the bottom of the article.

Peering past the viewer with a gaze at once purposeful and serenely self-possessed, the Maharaja Pratap Singh of Orrcha commands his realm as surely as a great actor holds the stage. His beard and mustache rise on either side of his face in two dramatic upswept waves. A filigreed turban crown sits rakishly across his brow. A mighty cape is parted to reveal his elaborate costume's silks, jewels and embroidered sashes. One white-gloved hand grips the cross-hatched hilt of a sword. The other rests lightly on the swirling scrollwork of a settee.

It's fitting that everything about this 1903 photograph, right down to a painted backdrop, should seem so theatrical. Public performance, celebrity and the power of appearances were a big part of any maharaja's appeal during the centuries these storied figures hovered over Indian life.

But as a major touring show at the Asian Art Museum sets out to demonstrate, maharajas (Sanskrit for "great kings") were anything but showy figureheads. With their political, economic, social and cultural clout, the maharajas exerted far more influence than the reductive stereotypes of conspicuous consumption and irrelevant extravagance, a commonplace of the British colonial era, suggest. Flashy as it might be, their grandeur was very real. Taxation, infrastructure, education, militias and political favors were among the things a maharaja might control in his region.

Reporter Leah Garchik describes the scene:

"At the Asian Art Museum on Wednesday, local maharajas, maharanis and royal Indian wannabes decked themselves in exquisite and bejeweled finery, and gorgeous though they were, thereby demonstrated that even the most elegant modern trappings look understated and casual when compared with the dazzle of the past. The museum was a sea of sequins, gems and brightly colored embroidered silks for the gala opening of "Maharaja: The Splendor of India's Royal Courts," but the exhibition's silver coach - the preferred means of transportation/making a grand entrance in India in 1915, when it was made - far outglittered the fleet of Mercedeses and town cars pulling up at the valet outside.

"I thought we were here to protest Wall Street," said one wisecracker, as 650 dazzling guests - I saw not one black evening gown - sat down to a three-goblet, lined-napkin (so the silk doesn't slide off one's lap) dinner, created by Taste catering and Amber India restaurants. The gala was sold out months ago.

But it's not fair to say the exhibition celebrates the rich. It's more a tribute to the embroiderers, the silversmiths, the gem cutters, sculptors and painters who created all of this, mostly in over-the-top ornamental homage to flora and fauna.

As to the art lovers there to support the museum, director Jay Xu said this, the largest such event in its history, was the beginning of engaging "all the donors," from the most generous to "everyone who comes through our door." The V neckline of Xu's lapel-less and sleek blanc de chine tuxedo echoed his museum's new graphic symbol, an upside-down A. Mathematically, he said, that upside-down A symbol means "for all," and it reflects "our new perspective, bold and confident."

At our table, we boldly and confidently wondered about the gender neutrality of a seven-strand pearl necklace designed for a man."


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/13/PKSF1LDV6N.DTL#ixzz1bdM2b2oc
Posted by Haggin Museum Docent Council at 12:09 PM No comments:

Saturday, October 8, 2011

New at Cantor Center: Rodin


"Rodin and America: Influence and Adaptation, 1876-1936,"

just opened at Stanford's Cantor Arts Center, does everything an exhibition organized by a teaching museum ought to do. Examining a little-studied moment in American art - the immediate impact here of Auguste Rodin's work and myth - it will inform and surprise even the most prepared visitor.

Names almost as famous as Rodin's add luster to the project - John Singer Sargent, Georgia O'Keeffe, Edward Steichen, Alfred Stieglitz, Alexander Calder - but much of the work displayed represents artists familiar only to specialists in the period.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/10/07/DD861LDQRI.DTL#ixzz1aDXDbeJD
Posted by Haggin Museum Docent Council at 11:38 AM No comments:
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Followers

Blog Archive

  • ►  2015 (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2014 (14)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2013 (22)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (29)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2011 (55)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ▼  October (4)
      • A School That Does Not Compute
      • 'Masters of Venice' show at De Young Museum
      • Maharaja at Asian Art Museum in S.F.
      • New at Cantor Center: Rodin
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (27)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (32)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (7)

About Me

My photo
Haggin Museum Docent Council
Stockton, California, United States
1201 N. Pershing Ave. Stockton, CA 95203-1699 Phone: (209) 940-6300 Fax: (209) 462-1404
View my complete profile
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.